<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 351 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450570</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Hyderabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding service tax levy on row houses in a gated community. The tribunal held that construction of residential complexes with 12 or fewer units remains exempt from service tax both before and after July 1, 2012. The respondent sold developed plots and separately contracted to construct individual houses, with plans approved in buyers&#039; names. Following the precedent in MACRO MARVEL PROJECTS LTD., approved by the SC, the tribunal confirmed that only residential complexes exceeding 12 units attract service tax, as lawmakers intended to exempt individual residential unit construction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 351 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450570</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Hyderabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding service tax levy on row houses in a gated community. The tribunal held that construction of residential complexes with 12 or fewer units remains exempt from service tax both before and after July 1, 2012. The respondent sold developed plots and separately contracted to construct individual houses, with plans approved in buyers&#039; names. Following the precedent in MACRO MARVEL PROJECTS LTD., approved by the SC, the tribunal confirmed that only residential complexes exceeding 12 units attract service tax, as lawmakers intended to exempt individual residential unit construction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>