<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 347 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Service Tax demand beyond the normal period of limitation, acknowledging no suppression of facts by the appellant. It directed the appellant to pay the undisputed interest of Rs.1,05,581/- and allowed the adjustment of short-payment against excess payment. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 347 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Service Tax demand beyond the normal period of limitation, acknowledging no suppression of facts by the appellant. It directed the appellant to pay the undisputed interest of Rs.1,05,581/- and allowed the adjustment of short-payment against excess payment. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>