<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 970 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312788</link>
    <description>The SC accepted the appeal, overturning the HC and Industrial Tribunal&#039;s decisions, and reinstated the original dismissal order by the Punishing Authority. The SC emphasized the distinct standards of proof in disciplinary versus criminal proceedings, finding the Tribunal improperly disregarded testimony from Management witnesses. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:20:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 970 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312788</link>
      <description>The SC accepted the appeal, overturning the HC and Industrial Tribunal&#039;s decisions, and reinstated the original dismissal order by the Punishing Authority. The SC emphasized the distinct standards of proof in disciplinary versus criminal proceedings, finding the Tribunal improperly disregarded testimony from Management witnesses. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>