<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 325 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450544</link>
    <description>HC found the Commissioner of Central Tax Appeals-II&#039;s order dismissing an appeal as time-barred was incorrect. The appeal was initially filed online within time, though physical filing occurred later. HC set aside the order and directed reconsideration of the delay condonation application, emphasizing procedural compliance and prompt resolution without examining case merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 325 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450544</link>
      <description>HC found the Commissioner of Central Tax Appeals-II&#039;s order dismissing an appeal as time-barred was incorrect. The appeal was initially filed online within time, though physical filing occurred later. HC set aside the order and directed reconsideration of the delay condonation application, emphasizing procedural compliance and prompt resolution without examining case merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>