<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 320 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450539</link>
    <description>Entry No. 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) exempts educational services only where the provider qualifies as an educational institution under paragraph 2(y), namely by offering pre-school to higher secondary education, education forming part of a curriculum leading to a qualification recognised by law, or education under an approved vocational education course. The AAR held that the applicant did not produce sufficient material to show that its courses formed part of a legally recognised qualification curriculum, and did not establish the specific requirements for the vocational education route, including registration with the Directorate General of Training for the relevant Modular Employable Skill Course pathway. Exemption notifications are strictly construed, and the burden rests on the claimant to prove entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 320 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450539</link>
      <description>Entry No. 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) exempts educational services only where the provider qualifies as an educational institution under paragraph 2(y), namely by offering pre-school to higher secondary education, education forming part of a curriculum leading to a qualification recognised by law, or education under an approved vocational education course. The AAR held that the applicant did not produce sufficient material to show that its courses formed part of a legally recognised qualification curriculum, and did not establish the specific requirements for the vocational education route, including registration with the Directorate General of Training for the relevant Modular Employable Skill Course pathway. Exemption notifications are strictly construed, and the burden rests on the claimant to prove entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>