<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 315 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450534</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and remanded the case for fresh consideration. The petitioner was instructed to submit the missing documents within a specified timeframe. The AO must conduct a personal hearing and issue a reasoned order, justifying the non-genuine transaction claim despite the petitioner&#039;s submissions. The rule was made absolute, and the petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 315 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450534</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and remanded the case for fresh consideration. The petitioner was instructed to submit the missing documents within a specified timeframe. The AO must conduct a personal hearing and issue a reasoned order, justifying the non-genuine transaction claim despite the petitioner&#039;s submissions. The rule was made absolute, and the petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>