https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450496 CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit on warranty services. The tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed CENVAT credit on service tax paid for warranty services provided by dealers to customers on behalf of the appellant. Following precedent from appellant's own case and JCB India Ltd. v. CCE-Delhi-IV, the tribunal ruled that such services qualify for input service credit under CENVAT rules. The impugned orders were set aside as unsustainable in law. en-us Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450496 CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit on warranty services. The tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed CENVAT credit on service tax paid for warranty services provided by dealers to customers on behalf of the appellant. Following precedent from appellant's own case and JCB India Ltd. v. CCE-Delhi-IV, the tribunal ruled that such services qualify for input service credit under CENVAT rules. The impugned orders were set aside as unsustainable in law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450496