https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312786 The Chhattisgarh HC allowed a writ appeal challenging an order that vacated a stay without permitting the appellant to file a counter-affidavit. The court found this violated natural justice principles as the appellant was denied the opportunity to oppose the application for vacating stay. The respondents were permitted to finalize a freight terminal project at their own risk pending final adjudication. The HC held the impugned order was not a pure interlocutory order under Section 2(1) of the 2006 Act, making the writ appeal maintainable and rejecting preliminary objections regarding maintainability. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:02:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312786 The Chhattisgarh HC allowed a writ appeal challenging an order that vacated a stay without permitting the appellant to file a counter-affidavit. The court found this violated natural justice principles as the appellant was denied the opportunity to oppose the application for vacating stay. The respondents were permitted to finalize a freight terminal project at their own risk pending final adjudication. The HC held the impugned order was not a pure interlocutory order under Section 2(1) of the 2006 Act, making the writ appeal maintainable and rejecting preliminary objections regarding maintainability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312786