https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312785 A writ appeal does not lie against an interlocutory order lacking finality on the substantive reliefs in the writ petition. The Single Judge's direction to evaluate the answer paper was only an interim order; issues on valuation, addition of marks, and the legality of the evaluation remained pending. Applying the proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006, the HC held that no appeal lies from such an interlocutory order. The writ appeal was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the parties to contest the merits before the Single Judge. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:02:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312785 A writ appeal does not lie against an interlocutory order lacking finality on the substantive reliefs in the writ petition. The Single Judge's direction to evaluate the answer paper was only an interim order; issues on valuation, addition of marks, and the legality of the evaluation remained pending. Applying the proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006, the HC held that no appeal lies from such an interlocutory order. The writ appeal was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the parties to contest the merits before the Single Judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312785