<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1839 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312776</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the finding of guilt against the Respondent for unauthorized disclosure and improper fund transfer but modified the penalty from dismissal to compulsory retirement, citing the absence of direct misappropriation or fraudulent intent. The HC&#039;s decision to reinstate the Respondent with back wages was deemed inappropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1839 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312776</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the finding of guilt against the Respondent for unauthorized disclosure and improper fund transfer but modified the penalty from dismissal to compulsory retirement, citing the absence of direct misappropriation or fraudulent intent. The HC&#039;s decision to reinstate the Respondent with back wages was deemed inappropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>