<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36047</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, determining that the loss incurred in a transaction with M/s. Rallis India Ltd. constituted a speculative transaction and amounted to a speculation business under section 73(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. As a result, the set-off of the Rs. 13,500 loss against other business income was disallowed. The case was referred back to the Tribunal for further examination on whether the transaction met the criteria for a speculative transaction. No costs were awarded in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:52:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36047</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, determining that the loss incurred in a transaction with M/s. Rallis India Ltd. constituted a speculative transaction and amounted to a speculation business under section 73(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. As a result, the set-off of the Rs. 13,500 loss against other business income was disallowed. The case was referred back to the Tribunal for further examination on whether the transaction met the criteria for a speculative transaction. No costs were awarded in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>