<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 246 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the imported goods, specifically bed sheets made of 100% polyester yarn, were correctly classified by the respondent under CTH 6304 as &quot;Other furnishing articles.&quot; Consequently, the goods were not subject to confiscation, and no penalty or redemption fine was imposed. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no evidence of willful mis-declaration by the respondent, thereby negating the imposition of a penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. This decision underscores the necessity for accurate classification and the requirement of evidence of intentional mis-declaration to justify penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 246 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the imported goods, specifically bed sheets made of 100% polyester yarn, were correctly classified by the respondent under CTH 6304 as &quot;Other furnishing articles.&quot; Consequently, the goods were not subject to confiscation, and no penalty or redemption fine was imposed. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no evidence of willful mis-declaration by the respondent, thereby negating the imposition of a penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. This decision underscores the necessity for accurate classification and the requirement of evidence of intentional mis-declaration to justify penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>