<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 240 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450459</link>
    <description>A Discharge Certificate issued under the SVLDRS Scheme has conclusive effect and bars subsequent adjudication for the declared period; therefore adjudicating authorities lack jurisdiction to continue proceedings absent revocation. The power to revoke or cancel a Discharge Certificate resides exclusively with the Designated Committee which verifies declarations; revocation by adjudicating officers is impermissible. Allowing adjudicating authorities to annul such certificates would disturb administrative hierarchy and risk conflicting orders. The impugned adjudication order was set aside because no revocation or cancellation by the Designated Committee had occurred, so further adjudication was prohibited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 240 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450459</link>
      <description>A Discharge Certificate issued under the SVLDRS Scheme has conclusive effect and bars subsequent adjudication for the declared period; therefore adjudicating authorities lack jurisdiction to continue proceedings absent revocation. The power to revoke or cancel a Discharge Certificate resides exclusively with the Designated Committee which verifies declarations; revocation by adjudicating officers is impermissible. Allowing adjudicating authorities to annul such certificates would disturb administrative hierarchy and risk conflicting orders. The impugned adjudication order was set aside because no revocation or cancellation by the Designated Committee had occurred, so further adjudication was prohibited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>