<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand under Erection, Commissioning, or Installation Services (ECIS) and Management, Maintenance, or Repair Services (MMR) for the period 2005-06 to 2009-10. The Tribunal concluded that the services should be classified as works contract services (WC), consistent with previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 08:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand under Erection, Commissioning, or Installation Services (ECIS) and Management, Maintenance, or Repair Services (MMR) for the period 2005-06 to 2009-10. The Tribunal concluded that the services should be classified as works contract services (WC), consistent with previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>