<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 225 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450444</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s refusal to condone a substantial delay in filing the appeals, finding no reason to disturb the view that sufficient cause had not been shown. As a result, the dismissal of the appeals on limitation grounds was sustained. The merits of the exemption claim under Section 11(1)(i) of the Haryana Special Economic Zone Act, 2005, as amended, were not adjudicated and were expressly left open for an appropriate future case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 225 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450444</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s refusal to condone a substantial delay in filing the appeals, finding no reason to disturb the view that sufficient cause had not been shown. As a result, the dismissal of the appeals on limitation grounds was sustained. The merits of the exemption claim under Section 11(1)(i) of the Haryana Special Economic Zone Act, 2005, as amended, were not adjudicated and were expressly left open for an appropriate future case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>