<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312770</link>
    <description>The GJ HC addressed a dispute concerning the classification of lease, tenancy, or easement under the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner contended these should not be classified as supply of services. The court issued a notice returnable on 07.12.2023 and granted ad-interim relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 05:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312770</link>
      <description>The GJ HC addressed a dispute concerning the classification of lease, tenancy, or easement under the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner contended these should not be classified as supply of services. The court issued a notice returnable on 07.12.2023 and granted ad-interim relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>