https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312766 A criminal quashing petition invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC is not maintainable when filed by a power of attorney holder of the accused unless a recognised legal disability exists or the Court has granted permission; the accused must ordinarily invoke such extraordinary jurisdiction personally. The Court also applied the clean hands principle and held that non-disclosure of material chronology, including arrest-related and bail-related , amounted to suppression of material facts. On both grounds, the petition was rejected at the threshold and the challenge to the criminal proceedings was not entertained. en-us Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2024 05:54:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312766 A criminal quashing petition invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC is not maintainable when filed by a power of attorney holder of the accused unless a recognised legal disability exists or the Court has granted permission; the accused must ordinarily invoke such extraordinary jurisdiction personally. The Court also applied the clean hands principle and held that non-disclosure of material chronology, including arrest-related and bail-related , amounted to suppression of material facts. On both grounds, the petition was rejected at the threshold and the challenge to the criminal proceedings was not entertained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312766