<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2148 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312763</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, despite arguments related to Section 269 SS of the Income Tax Act. The court held that non-compliance with Section 269 SS does not invalidate prosecution for cheque dishonor. The petitioner may raise related defenses during trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 05:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2148 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312763</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, despite arguments related to Section 269 SS of the Income Tax Act. The court held that non-compliance with Section 269 SS does not invalidate prosecution for cheque dishonor. The petitioner may raise related defenses during trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>