https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312762 The proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 does not operate as an absolute bar against every interim order. Read with the main provision conferring a statutory appeal from a Single Judge's judgment or order in original Article 226 jurisdiction, the proviso excludes only orders that are truly interlocutory or supervisory under Article 227. An interim order is appealable if it decides matters of moment, affects valuable or vital rights, or has irreversible finality. Maintainability therefore depends on the nature, tenor, effect, and final character of the order, not merely on its interim form. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2024 05:54:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312762 The proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 does not operate as an absolute bar against every interim order. Read with the main provision conferring a statutory appeal from a Single Judge's judgment or order in original Article 226 jurisdiction, the proviso excludes only orders that are truly interlocutory or supervisory under Article 227. An interim order is appealable if it decides matters of moment, affects valuable or vital rights, or has irreversible finality. Maintainability therefore depends on the nature, tenor, effect, and final character of the order, not merely on its interim form. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312762