https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312758 The accused was convicted under s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for issuing a bounced cheque. The trial and appellate courts upheld the conviction. The accused failed to rebut the presumption under s. 139, leaving the burden of proof unmet. The court reduced the sentence to time served, dismissing the revision with this modification. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312758 The accused was convicted under s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for issuing a bounced cheque. The trial and appellate courts upheld the conviction. The accused failed to rebut the presumption under s. 139, leaving the burden of proof unmet. The court reduced the sentence to time served, dismissing the revision with this modification. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312758