https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312755 The proviso to Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 was construed as a qualifying exception to the general right of intra-court appeal, not an absolute bar against every interlocutory order. Maintainability depends on the real nature, tenor, effect and impact of the Single Judge's order, including whether it materially affects final rights, has sufficient finality, or causes serious injustice. A mere label of "interlocutory" is not decisive if the order substantially determines rights or influences the final outcome. The earlier view that no writ appeal lay against an interim order was overruled on this basis. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312755 The proviso to Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 was construed as a qualifying exception to the general right of intra-court appeal, not an absolute bar against every interlocutory order. Maintainability depends on the real nature, tenor, effect and impact of the Single Judge's order, including whether it materially affects final rights, has sufficient finality, or causes serious injustice. A mere label of "interlocutory" is not decisive if the order substantially determines rights or influences the final outcome. The earlier view that no writ appeal lay against an interim order was overruled on this basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312755