https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312755 The Div. Bench concluded that the proviso to Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, does not impose an absolute bar on appeals against interlocutory orders. The maintainability of such appeals depends on the order's nature, tenor, effect, and impact. The court overruled prior inconsistent decisions and emphasized the need to consider Supreme Court guidelines and scrutinize each case's facts. The matter was remanded to the Div. Bench for further adjudication. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312755 The Div. Bench concluded that the proviso to Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, does not impose an absolute bar on appeals against interlocutory orders. The maintainability of such appeals depends on the order's nature, tenor, effect, and impact. The court overruled prior inconsistent decisions and emphasized the need to consider Supreme Court guidelines and scrutinize each case's facts. The matter was remanded to the Div. Bench for further adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312755