<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (12) TMI 12 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312754</link>
    <description>The appellate Ct dismissed the appeal as incompetent, determining the order lacked finality and was not a decree under Section 109(a) of the Civil Procedure Code. The damages claim did not vest in the Official Assignee, necessitating a remand for trial. The case remains live, pending determination on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (12) TMI 12 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312754</link>
      <description>The appellate Ct dismissed the appeal as incompetent, determining the order lacked finality and was not a decree under Section 109(a) of the Civil Procedure Code. The damages claim did not vest in the Official Assignee, necessitating a remand for trial. The case remains live, pending determination on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>