<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 256 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312753</link>
    <description>The HC determined that the Sessions Judge&#039;s conduct compromised the fairness of the trial, leading to the dismissal of key witness testimonies due to intimidation. The court clarified the limitations on using the FIR for corroboration. Consequently, the appeal was accepted, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released immediately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 256 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312753</link>
      <description>The HC determined that the Sessions Judge&#039;s conduct compromised the fairness of the trial, leading to the dismissal of key witness testimonies due to intimidation. The court clarified the limitations on using the FIR for corroboration. Consequently, the appeal was accepted, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released immediately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>