https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312752 The court determined that the suit was properly instituted under Order 37 CPC after a fresh notarized power of attorney cured the initial defect. The suit's validity was upheld, being based on written contracts, specifically purchase orders. The court required the defendants to deposit a specified amount to contest the suit, granting unconditional leave to one defendant due to a triable issue concerning export articles. The judgment underscored the significance of written contracts and proper legal documentation in maintaining the suit's validity and addressing counterclaims. en-us Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312752 The court determined that the suit was properly instituted under Order 37 CPC after a fresh notarized power of attorney cured the initial defect. The suit's validity was upheld, being based on written contracts, specifically purchase orders. The court required the defendants to deposit a specified amount to contest the suit, granting unconditional leave to one defendant due to a triable issue concerning export articles. The judgment underscored the significance of written contracts and proper legal documentation in maintaining the suit's validity and addressing counterclaims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312752