https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312752 A defective power of attorney lacking notarization does not, by itself, invalidate institution of a suit where the authority is later ratified through a fresh notarized instrument; the defect was treated as procedural and cured before summons for judgment. Purchase orders may constitute written contracts for purposes of Order 37 CPC, so a claim founded on them can proceed as a summary suit. Where the defendants raised a triable dispute about the nature of the transactions and related counter-claims, leave to defend was warranted, with the Court structuring relief on conditional terms rather than rejecting the suit outright. en-us Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312752 A defective power of attorney lacking notarization does not, by itself, invalidate institution of a suit where the authority is later ratified through a fresh notarized instrument; the defect was treated as procedural and cured before summons for judgment. Purchase orders may constitute written contracts for purposes of Order 37 CPC, so a claim founded on them can proceed as a summary suit. Where the defendants raised a triable dispute about the nature of the transactions and related counter-claims, leave to defend was warranted, with the Court structuring relief on conditional terms rather than rejecting the suit outright. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312752