https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312751 The HC set aside the seizure order and penalty notice under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) of the UPGST Act, as the petitioner had complied with E-way bill requirements before detention. The writ petition was allowed, leading to the immediate release of the goods and vehicle seized on 04.04.2018. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:58:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312751 The HC set aside the seizure order and penalty notice under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) of the UPGST Act, as the petitioner had complied with E-way bill requirements before detention. The writ petition was allowed, leading to the immediate release of the goods and vehicle seized on 04.04.2018. Case-Laws GST Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312751