<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1975 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312750</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside the seizure order and penalty notice under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) of the UPGST Act. The Court found the petitioner had complied with E-way bill requirements before detention. The Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and vehicle, favoring the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1975 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312750</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside the seizure order and penalty notice under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) of the UPGST Act. The Court found the petitioner had complied with E-way bill requirements before detention. The Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and vehicle, favoring the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>