<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 220 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450439</link>
    <description>Electrical equipment manufacturer challenged GST show cause notices challenging goods classification. HC found potential pre-judgment in assessment process. Court directed fair opportunity for petitioner to respond to notices, emphasizing need to consider HSN Explanatory Notes and all relevant materials before final classification determination. Respondent&#039;s proposed tax rate increase from 18% to 28% was scrutinized for procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 220 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450439</link>
      <description>Electrical equipment manufacturer challenged GST show cause notices challenging goods classification. HC found potential pre-judgment in assessment process. Court directed fair opportunity for petitioner to respond to notices, emphasizing need to consider HSN Explanatory Notes and all relevant materials before final classification determination. Respondent&#039;s proposed tax rate increase from 18% to 28% was scrutinized for procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>