<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 219 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450438</link>
    <description>Movement of goods without the invoice and e-way bill at the time of interception was treated as a GST contravention justifying detention and penalty. The explanation for delayed generation of the e-way bill was found insufficient, and later production of documents did not cure the initial breach. The absence of required documents created a presumption of tax evasion that was not rebutted, and the claim that the vehicle was parked for unloading was unsupported on the facts. The detention proceedings and penalty were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 219 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450438</link>
      <description>Movement of goods without the invoice and e-way bill at the time of interception was treated as a GST contravention justifying detention and penalty. The explanation for delayed generation of the e-way bill was found insufficient, and later production of documents did not cure the initial breach. The absence of required documents created a presumption of tax evasion that was not rebutted, and the claim that the vehicle was parked for unloading was unsupported on the facts. The detention proceedings and penalty were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>