<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 203 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned a 98-day delay in the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding the explanation reasonable. It overturned the disallowance of the deduction claimed under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act for interest income from Andhra Bank deposits. The Tribunal, referencing precedents from the jurisdictional High Court and similar cases, allowed the deduction, quashing the CIT(A)-NFAC&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 203 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned a 98-day delay in the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding the explanation reasonable. It overturned the disallowance of the deduction claimed under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act for interest income from Andhra Bank deposits. The Tribunal, referencing precedents from the jurisdictional High Court and similar cases, allowed the deduction, quashing the CIT(A)-NFAC&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>