https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450415 Validity of a notification prohibiting export of non-basmati white rice was contested where exporter relied on pre-notification contracts and generated a shipping rotation. The notifications para 2 contained alternative subparagraphs; DGFT Trade Notice clarified that the three conditions are independent and fulfilling any one permits export, but the petitioner did not satisfy any condition. Prior judicial treatment of a similar challenge was followed. Consequently, the petition seeking permission to export under the notification was dismissed and relief denied. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450415 Validity of a notification prohibiting export of non-basmati white rice was contested where exporter relied on pre-notification contracts and generated a shipping rotation. The notifications para 2 contained alternative subparagraphs; DGFT Trade Notice clarified that the three conditions are independent and fulfilling any one permits export, but the petitioner did not satisfy any condition. Prior judicial treatment of a similar challenge was followed. Consequently, the petition seeking permission to export under the notification was dismissed and relief denied. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450415