<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 190 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450409</link>
    <description>Where premises form part of the liquidation estate, the liquidator&#039;s powers to take custody, control, protect and preserve assets extend to seeking eviction and handover of vacant possession, and that request falls within the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s residuary insolvency jurisdiction. A Small Causes Court injunction or status quo order does not oust that jurisdiction where it does not purport to control the insolvency forum. Once liquidation has commenced, civil suits or other proceedings against the corporate debtor are barred unless permitted by the Code, and inconsistent proceedings cannot restrict the liquidation process. The eviction order was therefore upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 190 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450409</link>
      <description>Where premises form part of the liquidation estate, the liquidator&#039;s powers to take custody, control, protect and preserve assets extend to seeking eviction and handover of vacant possession, and that request falls within the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s residuary insolvency jurisdiction. A Small Causes Court injunction or status quo order does not oust that jurisdiction where it does not purport to control the insolvency forum. Once liquidation has commenced, civil suits or other proceedings against the corporate debtor are barred unless permitted by the Code, and inconsistent proceedings cannot restrict the liquidation process. The eviction order was therefore upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>