<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36025</link>
    <description>Amounts shown as &quot;Earned Surplus&quot; in a balance-sheet were treated as reserves for capital computation under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 and the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, because balances kept separately under that accounting pattern formed part of the capital fund rather than current profits. Applying the same principle, additions made to Earned Surplus during the year were to be related back to the first day of the previous year and included in the reserve computation under the Explanation to rule 1 of the Second Schedule. The Tribunal&#039;s narrower reading was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s treatment was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36025</link>
      <description>Amounts shown as &quot;Earned Surplus&quot; in a balance-sheet were treated as reserves for capital computation under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 and the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, because balances kept separately under that accounting pattern formed part of the capital fund rather than current profits. Applying the same principle, additions made to Earned Surplus during the year were to be related back to the first day of the previous year and included in the reserve computation under the Explanation to rule 1 of the Second Schedule. The Tribunal&#039;s narrower reading was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s treatment was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>