<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 181 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450400</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. It determined that the appellant&#039;s services, provided with materials, qualified under &quot;Works Contract Service,&quot; thus negating the service tax demand. However, as the appellant had collected and paid the service tax from the recipient, no refund was granted. The appeal was disposed of on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:55:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 181 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450400</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. It determined that the appellant&#039;s services, provided with materials, qualified under &quot;Works Contract Service,&quot; thus negating the service tax demand. However, as the appellant had collected and paid the service tax from the recipient, no refund was granted. The appeal was disposed of on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>