https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312722 Under Section 43-D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, the bail court must independently examine the case diary or charge-sheet to decide whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation is prima facie true, and it cannot refuse bail merely because cognizance has been taken or the allegations are serious. On the material described, the prosecution did not show direct evidence linking the accused to the bomb planting or explosion, and the alleged involvement was only inferential without the required evidentiary chain. The statutory bar to bail was therefore not attracted, and bail was granted. en-us Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312722 Under Section 43-D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, the bail court must independently examine the case diary or charge-sheet to decide whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation is prima facie true, and it cannot refuse bail merely because cognizance has been taken or the allegations are serious. On the material described, the prosecution did not show direct evidence linking the accused to the bomb planting or explosion, and the alleged involvement was only inferential without the required evidentiary chain. The statutory bar to bail was therefore not attracted, and bail was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312722