https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312722 The AP HC granted bail to two appellants charged with bomb explosion-related offenses. The prosecution alleged appellants purchased SIM card and cell phone in benami names at different locations, which were used in bomb explosion. The court applied the "prima facie" test under Section 43-D, finding the prosecution's case insufficient at bail stage. While evidence linked appellants to purchase of devices, the court noted prosecution had "very long way to go" to prove guilt, requiring witness examination and establishing complete chain of evidence. The court emphasized need for careful balance in bail decisions without prejudging trial merits. Appellants were granted bail on executing bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties. en-us Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:55:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312722 The AP HC granted bail to two appellants charged with bomb explosion-related offenses. The prosecution alleged appellants purchased SIM card and cell phone in benami names at different locations, which were used in bomb explosion. The court applied the "prima facie" test under Section 43-D, finding the prosecution's case insufficient at bail stage. While evidence linked appellants to purchase of devices, the court noted prosecution had "very long way to go" to prove guilt, requiring witness examination and establishing complete chain of evidence. The court emphasized need for careful balance in bail decisions without prejudging trial merits. Appellants were granted bail on executing bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312722