https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450397 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand based on the extended period of limitation, allowing the appeal on limitation grounds. The appellant, a medicament manufacturer, successfully argued against the Revenue's invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovering differential duty on physician samples, as there was no evidence of suppression or misrepresentation. en-us Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450397 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand based on the extended period of limitation, allowing the appeal on limitation grounds. The appellant, a medicament manufacturer, successfully argued against the Revenue's invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovering differential duty on physician samples, as there was no evidence of suppression or misrepresentation. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450397