https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450394 Bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act is constrained by Section 43D(5), requiring the court to first assess whether the accusation is prima facie true from the case diary and Section 173 CrPC report. Where the material shows repeated contact with a co-accused, disclosure statements indicating travel to Srinagar to procure a weapon, and participation in a preparatory act linked to terrorist activity, the statutory embargo applies and the general principles of bail do not prevail. Delay in trial, by itself, does not displace the bar where serious UAPA allegations remain under examination. On the stated material, bail is not warranted. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450394 Bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act is constrained by Section 43D(5), requiring the court to first assess whether the accusation is prima facie true from the case diary and Section 173 CrPC report. Where the material shows repeated contact with a co-accused, disclosure statements indicating travel to Srinagar to procure a weapon, and participation in a preparatory act linked to terrorist activity, the statutory embargo applies and the general principles of bail do not prevail. Delay in trial, by itself, does not displace the bar where serious UAPA allegations remain under examination. On the stated material, bail is not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450394