<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 175 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450394</link>
    <description>SC dismissed bail application under UAP Act and other charges. Court applied two-tier test: first, whether accusations are prima facie true based on reasonable grounds; second, if first test fails, the tripod test (flight risk, witness influence, evidence tampering). Court found prima facie case established through disclosure statements showing appellant&#039;s involvement in terrorist activities with banned organizations, including money exchanges requiring investigation. Given gravity of charges and likelihood of witness intimidation, trial delay alone insufficient grounds for bail. Appellant&#039;s complicity in conspiracy under Section 18 UAP Act established through preparatory acts facilitating terrorist activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 175 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450394</link>
      <description>SC dismissed bail application under UAP Act and other charges. Court applied two-tier test: first, whether accusations are prima facie true based on reasonable grounds; second, if first test fails, the tripod test (flight risk, witness influence, evidence tampering). Court found prima facie case established through disclosure statements showing appellant&#039;s involvement in terrorist activities with banned organizations, including money exchanges requiring investigation. Given gravity of charges and likelihood of witness intimidation, trial delay alone insufficient grounds for bail. Appellant&#039;s complicity in conspiracy under Section 18 UAP Act established through preparatory acts facilitating terrorist activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>