<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 174 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450393</link>
    <description>Where a statutory demand notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is sent by registered post to the drawer&#039;s correct address, service may be presumed under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act unless rebutted by contrary proof. The absence of a postal track report or acknowledgment due card, by itself, does not establish non-service or invalidate cognizance and the summoning order. The complaint alleging cheque issuance, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, and dispatch of notice was therefore not liable to be quashed on the ground of want of proof of actual service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 174 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450393</link>
      <description>Where a statutory demand notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is sent by registered post to the drawer&#039;s correct address, service may be presumed under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act unless rebutted by contrary proof. The absence of a postal track report or acknowledgment due card, by itself, does not establish non-service or invalidate cognizance and the summoning order. The complaint alleging cheque issuance, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, and dispatch of notice was therefore not liable to be quashed on the ground of want of proof of actual service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>