https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312721 The availability of a revision remedy does not, by itself, bar the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution or section 482 of the Code, so the maintainability objection failed. Section 73 of the Code authorises a warrant to apprehend an accused evading arrest, not to issue a warrant solely to aid police investigation; the impugned warrant was therefore unsustainable. Section 465 of the Code could not cure this defect because it applies to appellate, revisional, or confirmation proceedings and not to an ancillary investigative order under section 73. The warrant order was set aside. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:31:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312721 The availability of a revision remedy does not, by itself, bar the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution or section 482 of the Code, so the maintainability objection failed. Section 73 of the Code authorises a warrant to apprehend an accused evading arrest, not to issue a warrant solely to aid police investigation; the impugned warrant was therefore unsustainable. Section 465 of the Code could not cure this defect because it applies to appellate, revisional, or confirmation proceedings and not to an ancillary investigative order under section 73. The warrant order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312721