https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312719 The court upheld the trial magistrate's decision to allow the introduction of a witness affidavit after the defense had closed, emphasizing the wide powers granted under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act. The petitioner's challenge was dismissed, with the judgment underscoring the necessity of ensuring justice and adhering to Supreme Court guidance. The decision highlighted the court's authority to call witnesses at any stage to achieve a just outcome, prioritizing the interests of justice over procedural constraints. en-us Mon, 04 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:34:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312719 The court upheld the trial magistrate's decision to allow the introduction of a witness affidavit after the defense had closed, emphasizing the wide powers granted under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act. The petitioner's challenge was dismissed, with the judgment underscoring the necessity of ensuring justice and adhering to Supreme Court guidance. The decision highlighted the court's authority to call witnesses at any stage to achieve a just outcome, prioritizing the interests of justice over procedural constraints. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312719