<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1922 (10) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312718</link>
    <description>The HC, after reviewing the case, determined that the accused was guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under the first exception to Section 300 IPC, due to provocation. Despite procedural errors at the Sessions Court, the HC upheld the conviction under Section 304 IPC, sentencing the accused to life transportation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1922 (10) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312718</link>
      <description>The HC, after reviewing the case, determined that the accused was guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under the first exception to Section 300 IPC, due to provocation. Despite procedural errors at the Sessions Court, the HC upheld the conviction under Section 304 IPC, sentencing the accused to life transportation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>