<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (10) TMI 26 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312717</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the conviction and death sentence of one appellant under Section 302, Penal Code, dismissing his appeal. However, the appeals of two co-appellants were allowed due to reasonable doubt arising from the absence of their mention in the dying declaration. Their convictions and sentences were set aside, resulting in acquittal. The judgment highlighted the significance of credible evidence, adherence to judicial procedures, and ensuring no prejudice against the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (10) TMI 26 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312717</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the conviction and death sentence of one appellant under Section 302, Penal Code, dismissing his appeal. However, the appeals of two co-appellants were allowed due to reasonable doubt arising from the absence of their mention in the dying declaration. Their convictions and sentences were set aside, resulting in acquittal. The judgment highlighted the significance of credible evidence, adherence to judicial procedures, and ensuring no prejudice against the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>