<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1243 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312716</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition, finding no merit in the claims regarding alleged police misconduct, the need for further investigation, or the constitutionality of certain Cr. P.C. sections. The court upheld the role of the Public Prosecutor and denied requests for a private pleader and police protection, advising the petitioner to seek specific relief from the trial court if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1243 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312716</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition, finding no merit in the claims regarding alleged police misconduct, the need for further investigation, or the constitutionality of certain Cr. P.C. sections. The court upheld the role of the Public Prosecutor and denied requests for a private pleader and police protection, advising the petitioner to seek specific relief from the trial court if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>