<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1812 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312715</link>
    <description>Section 311 CrPC gives the court wide power to summon, recall, or re-examine a witness at any stage when the additional evidence is needed for a just decision. A mere procedural omission or inadvertent case-management error is not the same as an inherent lacuna in the prosecution. Where the proposed evidence is directed to curing an authorization defect, does not change the main substratum of the complaint, and causes no prejudice to the other side, rejection of the application is unsustainable. The Delhi HC therefore held that the petitioner was entitled to the requested opportunity and set aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1812 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312715</link>
      <description>Section 311 CrPC gives the court wide power to summon, recall, or re-examine a witness at any stage when the additional evidence is needed for a just decision. A mere procedural omission or inadvertent case-management error is not the same as an inherent lacuna in the prosecution. Where the proposed evidence is directed to curing an authorization defect, does not change the main substratum of the complaint, and causes no prejudice to the other side, rejection of the application is unsustainable. The Delhi HC therefore held that the petitioner was entitled to the requested opportunity and set aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>