https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312709 The SC allowed appeals by BCCL and connected parties, dismissing the appeal by the respondent. The SC held that writ petitions in tender matters are maintainable only when public law rights are violated, not for contractual disputes. Courts should exercise judicial review only for lawfulness, not soundness of executive decisions. The HC erred by interfering with BCCL's plausible interpretation of tender clauses without finding patent perversity or mala fide. The auction process and resultant tender award were restored, as contractual interpretation differences alone cannot justify judicial intervention in commercial decisions. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2024 18:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312709 The SC allowed appeals by BCCL and connected parties, dismissing the appeal by the respondent. The SC held that writ petitions in tender matters are maintainable only when public law rights are violated, not for contractual disputes. Courts should exercise judicial review only for lawfulness, not soundness of executive decisions. The HC erred by interfering with BCCL's plausible interpretation of tender clauses without finding patent perversity or mala fide. The auction process and resultant tender award were restored, as contractual interpretation differences alone cannot justify judicial intervention in commercial decisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312709