https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312705 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) depends on whether an essential and integral part of the cause of action arose within the Court's limits. Here, the impugned disciplinary orders were issued by authorities in Assam and West Bengal, so the material events giving rise to the grievance arose outside Bihar. The petitioner's residence in Bihar and receipt of the orders there were held to be only remote or incidental connections and not enough to found jurisdiction. On that basis, the writ petition was found not maintainable for want of territorial jurisdiction and was rejected. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:16:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312705 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) depends on whether an essential and integral part of the cause of action arose within the Court's limits. Here, the impugned disciplinary orders were issued by authorities in Assam and West Bengal, so the material events giving rise to the grievance arose outside Bihar. The petitioner's residence in Bihar and receipt of the orders there were held to be only remote or incidental connections and not enough to found jurisdiction. On that basis, the writ petition was found not maintainable for want of territorial jurisdiction and was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312705