<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 169 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450388</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax authorities&#039; order. The court found a mere technical error in the E-Way Bill address did not constitute tax evasion. Authorities failed to establish intent to evade tax. The court quashed the impugned orders, directed refund of deposited amount, and granted consequential reliefs to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 169 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450388</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax authorities&#039; order. The court found a mere technical error in the E-Way Bill address did not constitute tax evasion. Authorities failed to establish intent to evade tax. The court quashed the impugned orders, directed refund of deposited amount, and granted consequential reliefs to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>