https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450387 Bail was granted in a GST prosecution alleging wrongful input tax credit, cancellation of e-way bills and use of forged or fictitious documents because adjudication was still pending and no order quantifying the alleged excess credit had been passed. The Court noted that notices had been issued but the applicant's registration and the selling dealers' registrations had not been cancelled, and the defence relied on purchases from registered dealers and the absence of a quantification order. It also treated the likelihood of prolonged trial and continued custody as relevant, and held that the seriousness of the allegation alone was not decisive for bail. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450387 Bail was granted in a GST prosecution alleging wrongful input tax credit, cancellation of e-way bills and use of forged or fictitious documents because adjudication was still pending and no order quantifying the alleged excess credit had been passed. The Court noted that notices had been issued but the applicant's registration and the selling dealers' registrations had not been cancelled, and the defence relied on purchases from registered dealers and the absence of a quantification order. It also treated the likelihood of prolonged trial and continued custody as relevant, and held that the seriousness of the allegation alone was not decisive for bail. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450387