<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450370</link>
    <description>HC held reassessment proceedings invalid and quashed the notice under s.148 and the order under s.148A(d). The AO failed to grant the mandatory minimum seven days to reply to the s.148A(b) notice, and the approving authority (PCIT) granted approval before the s.148A(b) notice was digitally signed and before the s.148A(d) order was passed, rendering the issuance without jurisdiction and contrary to statutory requirements. Decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450370</link>
      <description>HC held reassessment proceedings invalid and quashed the notice under s.148 and the order under s.148A(d). The AO failed to grant the mandatory minimum seven days to reply to the s.148A(b) notice, and the approving authority (PCIT) granted approval before the s.148A(b) notice was digitally signed and before the s.148A(d) order was passed, rendering the issuance without jurisdiction and contrary to statutory requirements. Decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>