<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 135 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450354</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed the Appellant&#039;s Delay Condonation Application, ruling that the limitation period for filing an appeal began on 07.11.2023, when the order was passed in both parties&#039; presence. The Appellant&#039;s failure to apply for a certified copy within 30 days and the subsequent filing beyond the 15-day extension allowed by Section 61(2) proviso led to the rejection of the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the date of uploading the order was immaterial, and the Appellant&#039;s reliance on a Supreme Court precedent was distinguished due to the clear order presence in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:14:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 135 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450354</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed the Appellant&#039;s Delay Condonation Application, ruling that the limitation period for filing an appeal began on 07.11.2023, when the order was passed in both parties&#039; presence. The Appellant&#039;s failure to apply for a certified copy within 30 days and the subsequent filing beyond the 15-day extension allowed by Section 61(2) proviso led to the rejection of the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the date of uploading the order was immaterial, and the Appellant&#039;s reliance on a Supreme Court precedent was distinguished due to the clear order presence in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>