<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 126 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450345</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC dismissed appeal regarding CENVAT credit reversal under Rule 6(3) of Credit Rules. Assessee adopted hybrid option by reversing 6% of exempted goods value, satisfying conditions under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. Tribunal correctly allowed assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed demand. HC found no substantial question of law arose from Tribunal&#039;s order, confirming that proper reversal of credit met notification requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:14:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 126 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450345</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC dismissed appeal regarding CENVAT credit reversal under Rule 6(3) of Credit Rules. Assessee adopted hybrid option by reversing 6% of exempted goods value, satisfying conditions under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. Tribunal correctly allowed assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed demand. HC found no substantial question of law arose from Tribunal&#039;s order, confirming that proper reversal of credit met notification requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>